Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Lila Davis

Instructions are attached 

supporting doc attached 

Presenter’s Name:

Lila Davis

Person Providing Critique:

Brianna Davis

Component

Comments

Case summary:

Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court.

APA’s brief:

The APA’s stance was presented in an easy-to-understand manner. The presenter discussed relevant research included in the brief. It was clear how the APA was trying to contribute to the case.

Opinion:

I understood the outcome of the case and the presenter made clear how this did/did not coincide with the APA’s goals in their brief.

Overall:

This lecture was thorough, clear, interesting, and I learned something. The format was uncluttered and the length was appropriate. APA referencing was used properly and grammar/spelling was correct.

Directions: View the assigned PowerPoint presentations and fill out the form – one per each student’s presentation you are critiquing. For each component, write your comments. Write as much or as little as you feel necessary; the comments table should expand as you write. Remember, your critique will be graded as well – 25 points per critique.
Due by Sunday at 11:59 P.M. ET.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Chapter 1-Discussion 1: Chapter 2-Discussion 2: Outsmarting the Liars (see attached)  This should be no longer than two paragraphs per discussion and

Chapter 1-Discussion 1: Chapter 2-Discussion 2: Outsmarting the Liars (see attached)  This should be no longer than two paragraphs per discussion and should show your understanding of the week’s readings. Assignment has to demonstrate a meaningful synthesis of the material posted (typically a research article) and the corresponding chapter assigned